Understanding the Dynamic Analysis of Organized Systems.

The universe is formed by billions of “things” that inter-relate in multiple ways. These “things” forme what we humans describe as organized systems. Organized systems are groups of elements that relate to each other in ways that we humans have discovered. For instance, the solar system is an organized system because we know that all its planets rotate around the sun. We know that gravitational and centrifugal forces are at the core of the repetitive nature of the solar system's cycles.

I know that many people will say that the solar system was an organized system before we discovered its planets behaved in such a way. However, there are millions of organized systems out there that are not categorized as organized systems because people have not discovered the relationships that make them organized system. Ecosystems are systems in which the organization takes multiple relationships, generating non-simultaneous cycles that repeat in a non-synchronized manner, causing variations that repeat, but not simultaneously, nor in cycles that are identical to prior ones. In other words, even though ecosystems are organized, it took many thousands of years for humans to understand their organization. Even nowadays, people continue their lives changing key elements to most ecosystems, disregarding the nature of the organization of the systems, slowly destroying them.

My main interest in organized systems is in the composition of forces that make them survive as systems and in what it takes to modify ,destroy them, or replace them. In other words, I am interested in the analysis of what makes system to be systems.

  In a vacuum, a system only needs to have forces that cancel each other in order to retain its organization indefinitely. This is the case, more or less, of the solar system. Since any external forces are located light years away from our sun and planets, and the small asteroids that come to visit are insignificant in size and mass to alter our solar system's internal relationship, macro relationship in our system are sustained by adding to zero. In fact, in isolation, relationships within organized systems add to zero when all of them are considered. Any structure, like a building, a bridge, or an engine is made of parts that when put together have convergent and diverging forces that added sum zero. Unlike structures that can be considered as being in relative isolation, except for the weight they will bear, an engine's work will be very variable. For this reason, the life of a building is much more predictable than the life of an engine. In fact, the more complicated the relationship between a system and the medium in which it exists, the less predictable the system becomes.

 OK, I am still writing this!